Elsevier researcher academy

Three years ago, I was on my third rejected paper.

Each time, the feedback was vague:

> “Needs stronger literature foundation.”
> “The abstract lacks clarity.”
> “Methods unclear.”

I remember staring at those comments thinking,
“Why does nobody teach us this properly?”

Then, out of frustration, I stumbled upon Elsevier Researcher Academy—a set of short, free courses by actual journal editors.

And that changed everything.

Here are ten I wish I’d found earlier:

– How to write a literature review (60 min)
https://lnkd.in/gRsWFvdy

– How to identify research gaps (12 min)
https://lnkd.in/gvxgD95D

– How to conduct evidence-based research (38 min)
https://lnkd.in/gMUxXybm

– How to find relevant research papers (15 min)
https://lnkd.in/gKXauFHr

– How to write an abstract (40 min)
https://lnkd.in/g9drbDZF

– How to secure funding (60 min)
https://lnkd.in/g-diuMPv

– How to use Gen AI in research (53 min)
https://lnkd.in/gepXEzBf

– Author policies on the use of Generative AI (11 min)
https://lnkd.in/gT4Xg7y

– How to write a cover letter (8 min)
https://lnkd.in/gFA_pNkd

– How to respond to reviewers’ comments (37 min)
https://lnkd.in/gcG7mxrc

source:

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/mhshoukat_three-years-ago-i-was-on-my-third-rejected-activity-7391077952240783360-WW30/?utm_medium=ios_app&rcm=ACoAABPIeEkBQ6GvlxFXmZ8nP4yZeLtBo4pqYyk&utm_source=social_share_send&utm_campaign=whatsapp