𝗞𝘆𝗼𝘁𝗼 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝘁𝗼𝗰𝗼𝗹 𝘃𝘀 𝗣𝗮𝗿𝗶𝘀 𝗔𝗴𝗿𝗲𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁
When people talk about international climate action, the Paris Agreement takes center stage. But without the Kyoto Protocol, Paris may never have existed.
The two treaties often get confused, yet they reflect two very different eras in global climate policy:
𝗞𝘆𝗼𝘁𝗼 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝘁𝗼𝗰𝗼𝗹 (𝟭𝟵𝟵𝟳–𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟬)
• Binding targets, but only for developed countries.
• Focused mainly on cutting emissions (mitigation).
• Created carbon markets (CDM, JI), but participation was limited.
• Ended up too rigid and narrow in scope.
𝗣𝗮𝗿𝗶𝘀 𝗔𝗴𝗿𝗲𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 (𝟮𝟬𝟭𝟱–𝗽𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗲𝗻𝘁)
• Applies to all countries through self-set climate plans (NDCs).
• Expanded to cover adaptation, finance, and loss & damage.
• Anchored the net-zero by 2050 vision.
• Backed by global stocktakes, transparency, and peer pressure.
𝗪𝗵𝘆 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗺𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝘁𝗼𝗱𝗮𝘆:
• 90%+ of the world economy is under net-zero pledges.
• $100B/year in climate finance is being mobilized under Paris.
• Carbon markets are evolving through Article 6.
• COP28 in Dubai reaffirmed the Paris goals with the first-ever Global Stocktake.
𝗜𝗻 𝘀𝗵𝗼𝗿𝘁:
• Kyoto = historic first step, but too limited.
• Paris = today’s global framework, universal and future-focused.
The distinctions between the two agreements can sometimes be overlooked. I’ve created a concise side-by-side PDF comparison of Kyoto Protocol vs Paris Agreement , would love to hear your thoughts after reading it .
Source:
Temukan peta dengan kualitas terbaik untuk gambar peta indonesia lengkap dengan provinsi.
