Local resource governance and community-driven circular economy practices in Sukolilo Village

Resource management is a strategic step that has thus far been evaluated by each party, especially for those who engage with the potential they manage. The main principle prioritized is how to carry out management accompanied by sustainability values (Alfian & Akbar, 2020; Holle et al., 2022). Management can be seen as a process of managing potential to create a product that influences society. The expected impact of this management aims to improve economically, socially, and environmentally (Burano, 2017; Lubis, 2003). Ideally, resource management practices are carried out by stakeholders, residents, and the
government. Involving several parties is expected to open a space for two-way interaction, mutual negotiation, expression of inspiration, and constructive ideas to answer the problems faced (Dharmawibawa, 2019; Surono, 2017). The reason is that in managing operations, it will encounter risky challenges associated with the environment and relevant regulations. Namely, dealing with the Ministry of Village Regulation No. 23 of 2017 concerning the development and application of technology for managing village natural resources, it is stated that those who use technology in managing village potential resources must pay attention to the values of environmental sustainability and community involvement.
Furthermore, another issue is that the management should also carry out an evaluation of the local community, focusing on the significance of beliefs, myths, and symbols that hold sacred meaning in relation to the environment (Sandjojo, 2017). There are many risks as a result of managing the potential of the village, which has an impact on local communities, namely research conducted by Burano (2017) explained that the results of the analysis of resource management in wetland agricultural areas in rural
areas using SWOT analysis stated that the area development plan is related to institutional development, agricultural sector development, preservation of community cultural values, environmental management and conservation, rural infrastructure development, and rural community development. The findings of Sahureka (2016) indicated that traits of the community in their use and management of forest resources are influenced by factors such as group, education level, occupation, and overall income. The land utilization patterns of the Hukurila village community can be categorized into five types: residential yards,
cultivation areas, dusung agroforestry, natural woodlands, and coastal regions. At the same time, the phases of land management include land preparation, sowing, upkeep, gathering, selling, and post-harvest processing.
From these two research results, it can be understood that resource management does not only focus on the object of potential that is managed but how the object of potential opens a potential management climate related to other institutions, including management licensing institutions, social and environmental impact analysis, planning institutions, and local communities that enter the management ring. It is done because things related to potential management will intersect with the relevant institutions, the environment, and the community. For example, if the management is related to the potential of sugarcane and water, it will be related to the agriculture office, sugarcane companies, and sugarcane farmer groups. Various stakeholders engaged in management tasks will establish the guidelines regarding the selling price, cultivation costs, labor wages, maintenance expenses, distribution of products, and marketing activities. It means that resource management is a practice of processing potential in which it comes into contact with technology as a processing tool, the system as a production flow, and agreements as game rules that are mutually applied by several parties involved.

source:

https://journal.bappenas.go.id/index.php/jpp/article/view/636